Actually very few "likes" come from the roleplaying section because roleplayers don't like to "like" their rp enemies (they are funny like that.) But thanks for the continuing evidence of goonswarm quality posting and lying about things. Seriously, take a breath, pour yourself a cup of tea, and go and smell the clean fresh air and have a think about why your defense of Alex Gianturco is pretty senseless beyond a childishly partizan playground gang mentality.

Posting in epic thread - and adding little substance like the majority of the posts.

I think the discussion about tea and crumpets contained substance.

[quote=Kallynda Nai]


Likes on a forun suggest that somebody likes what they've read.

And sure, its exploitable and many of the goons have done just that with script-hacks and such - but generally you can see when a quality poster is attracting likes for a post it means they are putting a reasonable argument across.

Actually, what you quoted was a direct quote from The Mittani. So yeah, you're right. A problem does exist between his keyboard and his chair. We're working on it.

And what are YOUR legal qualifications to make a sweeping statement like that? Actually don't answer that, since the statement is just disgruntled commentary on the current legal trend against cyber-bullying. Well, whether you like it or not, it is a powerful legal trend at the moment, and it will be taken into consideration when CCP makes their decision. That's obvious from the statement they've already released.

Deal with it.

(Oh wait, since The Mittani said that first, do I need to quote it or include foot notes or something? I'd sure hate to get in trouble for infringement. )

Um, no.

Where are you getting all this crap about petitions? My statement assumed a lawsuit for wrongful death filed in the US under a pretty standard cause of action against an as-of-yet unnamed bully. The defendant or plaintiff might drag CCP into the fray in a counter or cross-claim and point to a failure to act in THIS SITUATION as evidence that CCP is aware of cyber-bullying on their game and did nothing to discourage it. It's a perfectly logical and reasonable and common argument to make in such cases.

To put it simply, failing to substantively punish tbp The Mittani (Alex) opens CCP up to a reasonable claim if a similar case arises in the future that includes a viable plaintiff.

And no, none of this is said for the benefit of CCP's legal department. Trust me, they are already taking a look at the possible legal consequences of failing to take reasonable steps in this situation.

Edit: Also, disclaimers mean **** in cases of gross negligence, which is exactly what failure to act in previous similar cases would help prove. So yeah, it ignores the disclaimer completely, because it's irrelevant.

BoB killed RoyOfCA. I don't see anyone sperging about that

You really don't know how the great war started do you?

Then stop posting?

Oh God, so depressed.

Gonna OD and end it all.

The only medication I have access to is laxatives.

Wish me luck.